They say that you can never really go home. Until a few days ago I was beginning to think they may be right. The transition back from London to the Great Midwest has been an odd one. We had made great friends, been able to walk to great restaurants and pubs in the Sonning area, been able to train and walk anywhere in London, had developed a good schedule which balanced work and family life, and now we are back dealing with 2 properties, settling back in to old routines, and finding NOTHING has changed.

The nothing has changed bit is probably the most disheartening. We were excited to tell people of our adventures and they want to tell us about school, and organizational politics that frankly haven’t changed. We have tidbits from life abroad, and they have another new Mexican restaurant. We want to show pictures of the Alps, the Louvre, Wales, Colonques, and they have pictures of their new cat and want us to watch their new TV show. Everyone seems to be doing the same thing, with a bit more grey in their hair. I do not begrudge anyone for having done the same thing, but some seem to begrudge that we left them. We aren’t attempting to show off, but we haven’t seen or talked to our friends in 2 years and we are finding it hard to relate. Our experiences diverged and now we are trying to rekindle those friendships with different things to discuss and do.

Settling back in with a rental and moving into a new home has also been challenging. All of our furniture has been bought with the expectation of an open floor plan. No amount of shuffling of couches makes it fit or look any better. It still feels as if we are living in another temporary home. Our rental is possibly going to be vacant in March which causes stress. I love the new location but we have yet to make friends with kids locally, although our neighbor 2 doors down is awesome….but no kids.

So, when visiting our old property, which I love, we discovered 26 dead Ash trees. Nick, one of his friends, and I cut down and stacked 12 trees, and my buddy Dan and I cut down another 3. I allowed the renters to split and use a bunch, donated some to the Winter Club. Finally I was able to move (a huge debacle for another article) some to the new place (yes, probably Ash bores and all…none are left here either) the 3 miles down the road.

When the weather hit sub-freezing (7F or -17C) I began making fires in the wood burning stove located in the basement. After I repaired the fan which blows heated air into the basement, for the first time, I really felt at home. The home was warm, Jack and Nick helped bring in wood and stock the fire. We sat together playing cards, and watching movies…really relaxing. This rekindling of a fire was a common bonding exercise at the old house. The primal need to take care of family’s most basic needs is a strong force, one which settles one’s nerves and warms ones heart and soul.

When Suz asked me a few weeks ago where I felt home was, I answered “I didn’t know any more.” Obviously, home is where the heart is and wherever we live with our loved ones; that is the Hallmark definition of home. But I think home is also where a warm hearth is…one that you have labored over to keep warm. Now perhaps we can share that warmth with our friends, whose relationships we need to rekindle.


London 061A few days ago we were told officially we will be moving back from Reading, England to our home town of Cincinnati, OH. While I was hoping to write this post on our 2 year anniversary of moving to the UK, I know I will be swamped with the move and ensuing chaos that accompanies it. Writing this post hopefully will help anyone crazy enough to move to England from the US in the future.

In this hastily written post, I hope some of the most common questions we receive should help guide you through the process:

Why did you move to the UK and is it worth it?

Besides being told England is easy island living (great weather, rum drinks and palm trees), we as a family decided to see the world, and I professionally wanted to stretch myself and help the company during transition.

Read the rest of this entry »

We have reached the point where private unions should switch their allegiance from the Democrats who have only made workers’ plight worse to the libertarian Republicans. Now that would have sounded ludicrous 6 years ago, but today it makes perfect sense. I’ll try to explain why with a bit of history, analogy and stats.

The Democrats have done a wonderful job raking in campaign dollars from the unions regardless of what the workers believe. Union dues going directly to a single party is a bad idea b/c it will breed division. Division has been sown between the unions and the Republicans, and between unions and their employers, meanwhile cheap imports have flooded the US market in automobiles, electronics, clothing, furniture and damn near everything else we use to make. This division has also fueled employers like the meat packing industry to hire illegals to drive wages down…this has also occurred in non-unionized industries like technology as well. Both outsourcing overseas and HB1s have also driven wages down (albeit much slower). Divisions between US citizens does not help us win against a flood of cheap labor and cheap goods from abroad, but it does drive campaign funding.

My father worked at Cincinnati Gear for 25 years, and was a proud member of the AFL/CIO. He went through a number of strikes with the union to try to drive wages up. I remember the 2nd to last strike where they actually lost ground on wages and that hurt our family a great deal. The last strike they went on was after my father lost his sight and had to go on disability. This last strike was during a recession. Cincinnati Gear warned the workers that if they went on strike they would go bankrupt. The division between the union and the company caused distrust between the two…the strike happened, the company folded and ultimately only the workers were hurt. The AFL/CIO had the auto plants, and GE to keep paying off their political stooges…the workers…were screwed.

The typical talking track of old school Republicans would be that the union was greedy, while Democrats claimed that the company was unpatriotic or greedy. Neither talking track helps the workers, but it does drive politics. In the grand scheme it wasn’t either the union or the company that was the problem, it was distraction driven by division. The distraction is simple: The US under both parties has devalued our currency thereby making our money worth less and your salary worth less. The distraction is: The US has driven up taxes and regulations to the point where you cannot compete with cheap foreign labor, and cheap foreign goods b/c your dollar doesn’t go as far at Walmart. The distraction is: We have entered into agreements with the World Trade Organization and NAFTA that we cannot tax cheap, low quality goods costing us good American jobs. The distraction is: the Divisions keep us occupied pointing fingers at each other while China gets the upper hand, and our parties move farther from the middle.

42% of Americans now identify themselves as independent. Not Republican, not Democrat…Independent. Why? B/c the parties don’t represent the great middle, but instead the fringe of both sides and Division sown between workers and companies run and worked by Americans drives politics. The politics of division and distraction offer workers nothing but empty promises, empty paychecks, and no future.

This is why the unions need to turn their back on the Democrats and support libertarian Republicans. The new libertarian Republicans want to end the IRS and income tax and replace it with the FAIR Tax. I won’t get into great detail here, but read up on it at Think of this. You get taxed somewhere between 10-38% in Income Tax, 15.1% in FICA (yes your company pays about half of that), X% income tax at the state level, 2% in Obamacare tax, your benefits that you have fought for in the way of good healthcare has or will be eliminated/taxed in favor of crappy government mandates. Now the company you work for also pays 38% in corporate tax, plus 15-35% in Capital gains. How can you compete again with cheap overseas labor and goods?

Yes, there are write offs and tax deductions, but there is a phenomenon called “good enough.” Americans with their reduced income and buying power are happy to buy something that is “good enough.” I am continually told that Americans want to buy the best American made item they can…sure. We buy the cheapest thing that meets the need, fully knowing the cheap good from overseas will break and we can buy the next cheapest thing with more features next year. The division mentioned above also drives some Americans to deliberately buy foreign almost as retaliation. Both scenarios help no one but China.

Let me give you 2 more examples. When I was in college studying broadcasting, we were told that when HD came out no one would watch anything again in low quality analog. The quality would be so good people would forsake their old TVs for HD. Years of delays, and government subsidizing people did buy new TVs but did so b/c they were flat….most cable channels are still broadcasting in low Def. To make the point even more so…look at YouTube, Vine and other online videos taken on phones. Low quality is watched more than network TV. Even the News has video taken from phones, Skype and other low quality devices b/c the market seems to still cater to “good enough” which is even lower quality than old standard TV. And now all the TVs and accompanying devise are made abroad…no more RCA.

Another example is the housing industry. Gone are craftman homes, and instead we have pre-fabbed junk going up as McMansions. Low skill labor can insert tab A, into slot B and put these things together. People buy them knowing they will move in 5-7 years when they begin to fall apart. Forget repairs, just build a new one farther out where the schools are “better.”

logoTo level the playing field for both our workers and companies we need a FAIR TAX. The FAIR TAX works similar to a sales tax, but only applies to new goods which are non-essential. If you buy a new car, it’s taxed. If you buy a used car there is no tax. If you buy food at the supermarket, there is no tax. Buy food at a restaurant, it’s taxed. Items coming from overseas are taxed when they land b/c transactions occur here. NOTE: this is not an import tax b/c the above WTO and NAFTA treaties forbid import taxes, instead it’s a transaction tax as the cheap goods are purchased at the docks. The combination of no Income tax for workers and companies make us competitive again, and the FAIR Tax ensures that cheap labor and goods have to pay to have access to the US market.

Now I understand entrenched loyalties in the unions and the Democrat party would prevent such thinking. The media would tell you that the FAIR Tax would cost jobs…but the CBO says it would greatly enhance our domestic output and bring in the same amount of tax dollars to the Treasury. There is even a prebate refund in the tax to pay for low wage earners rent and food. Labor used offshore would be treated as a good and taxed as well, driving good paying jobs in Tech back to the states as too. Keep this in mind, the CBO has estimated that over $3 Trillion dollars are being held overseas by US headquartered companies b/c the US has the second highest corporate tax rate…that is almost double our current budget deficit. How much of that money would come back in the form of investment and new jobs if we were no longer punitive and instead had a FAIR TAX (estimates are almost 90%)? We are a connected world, we need to acknowledge this and play the correct game.

Division based on politics, salary, and greed would disappear with the introduction of the FAIR TAX. The unions should break their single party policy and support the goals of bringing manufacturing and manufacturing jobs back to the US instead of policies developed in the 1930s which have only driven jobs out of the US. It’s time to partner instead of divide and distract. The game has changed, our allegiances should as well.

From January to August of last year, John Bohannon submitted an academic study to 304 peer-reviewed scientific journals. All of the them were open access journals, a newer breed of digital-only academic publications that are free for readers but often charge researchers to publish. Bohannon’s study concerned a molecule, extracted from a lichen, that appeared […]

Link  —  Posted: January 14, 2014 in Uncategorized

Many customers ask me what is driving Cloud adoption.  When you look around the trade blogs tell you Capex shortages, applications, mobile, big data, etc are driving cloud adoption.  While these factors are driving much of cloud adoption, especially from the developer community, we are also seeing the expiration of Windows 2003 support also driving IT groups to look heavily into cloud.

win2003Yes, the now 11-year-old operating system is driving IT orgs to move to the cloud.  Windows 2003 was launched when my now 19-year-old son who is in the military was playing with his Legos in 3rd grade…  Why?  Many of our customers are still running physical servers which are aging, or they have already virtualized but the gear VMWARE is running on is also aging and the versions of VMWARE are also ending EOS.  If you can send a copy of the server to the cloud, build another Windows 2008 or 2012 server alongside you can test that application which was written in-house and long since forgotten without much expense.  As there is no direct upgrade path from Windows 2003, you have to do a migration.  It tends to be much easier for an IT staff to spend a few bucks in the cloud than it is to stand up a new VMWARE farm, upgrade the VMDK files, build new OSs and get the approval to spend money in-house.  The risk is much lower in the cloud.

Do all applications work in the cloud?  Depends…do all these aging applications work on a new OS?  Some do and some don’t.  So another good testing ground in the cloud is Citrix or Microsoft Application Packaging and streaming of old applications.  For many organizations, Citrix is a place for old, poorly written applications to die.  They package the app in the OS that they were written for, and sit it in the cloud on Windows 2012.  Application Virtualization holds the promise that virtualization is all about, reducing applications down to simply consuming CPU/RAM/Disk.  Cloud is giving customers the opportunity to test their processes with little to no risk of migrating applications to new more secure Operating systems.

ITILSo, is this easy?  No.  I suggest determining a repeatable process that includes everything from the technical part of migrating, to updating your ITIL processes including financials.  While at GE, I worked as a consultant for their Rationalization and Obsolescence team. This team was in charge of migrating applications and data from old servers, to new servers.  Back then we migrated old Unix and Windows-based servers to new hardware.  The processes I developed had to incorporate different workgroups (usually contracting companies), technical areas (Servers, DC, Storage, Networking, Accounting, etc), needed automation so was built into the ITIL CMBD and discovery tools, and needed reporting mechanisms back to the business units as they had footed the bill.  IT billback drove everything at GE and if you couldn’t document how you were saving them money…you didn’t get it done.

In all there was a possibility of 67 individual steps in the Rationalization process, but upfront after discovery those steps were whittled down.  If you were simply getting rid of old hardware that already was off you had about 9 steps.  If you had a server with multiple applications, SAN connections and you needed to upgrade to a new OS…you had many more steps.

The process ran as such:

  1. Create a project that has funding for a server or servers.
  2. Run discovery on the assets.  Are they on?  What is on them?  What is the attributes (Windows/Linux/SAN attached/etc).
  3. Fill out the info you learned into the workflow, it will build the Change Requests and  the WO steps including who has to do the work.
  4. If you are replacing, you follow the build process.
  5. Allow the application team to test on the new platform.  Make them sign off.
  6. Migrate.  This is the most intensive part, but if you did everything above correctly…you are fine.  Again, make the application team sign off that all is working.
  7. Ice the sever(s) and wait.
  8. Decom the server(s) and return all related assets back into inventory (HBAs, network ports, licenses, rack space and power)
  9. Dispose of the assets.  Get them off the books in accounting and process any regulatory procedures like wiping disks and disposal.

In all, once these processes were defined and automated my team of 5 technical PMs went from replacing 150 machines per year on average to over 1600.  We also could easily bring in less technical PMs to do the low-level work.  The processes were even modified for Virtualization which was adopted during that time.  DevOps can feed into these processes and will dramatically increase your productivity as well.  In all, we achieved a repeatable process that increased yield, and we developed reporting mechanisms back to business CIOs.  We reported which Applications teams were helping us migrate the fastest and who wasn’t, SLAs and total costs.  CMDB info was improved due to discovery, automation, using monitoring tools, and the repeatable process including naming conventions.  And of course, the accounting team was happy b/c we took thousands of assets off the books which they had been paying tax on and saving of expensive DC space.

Ultimately, we also began combining similar servers and services.  Web servers were consolidated into farms, file/print was consolidated onto cheap NAS storage, DNS, AD, and other services were consolidated and we even gave data to the WAN Optimization team to pull back services easily handled by the network.  In all, a small investment in consulting and programming saved GE $12.7 in hardware and double that in maintenance alone over a 2 year period.

So, as you look at your inventory of aging Operating systems ask how you can move them to the cloud and how you can migrate those applications.

Now what I have written above is the basics.  Each company will have nearly identical steps, but each will need to be customized based upon your working groups.  If you want to know more, contact me @davespiess on Twitter or find me on LinkedIn,

ITIL vs. DevOps

Posted: January 7, 2014 in Uncategorized
Tags: ,

In the land that invented ITIL, I am beginning to hear that ITIL is too restrictive and is going to die in favour of DevOps.  DevOps being the automation of IT though tools like Puppet and Chief.  As a former ITIL consultant and proponent, I would tend to disagree and note they the too disciplines are not mutually exclusive, just as I have previously written Six Sigma and ITIL work extremely well together.  DevOps and ITIL can go hand-in-hand.

Let’s imagine that a mature development company decides to move to the cloud and completely stop using internal IT Infrastructure resources.  This Dev company wants to speed up deployment of new applications and features and is tired of waiting for internal IT to procure equipment, obtain enough IOPs to make the application function for a SaaS customer, and to have staff to implement.  This is a valid reason to not only move to the Cloud but to also put in place DevOps.  DevOps can automate provisioning of servers, applications, Firewall and Load Balancing rules etc.  Our Cloud platform has APIs exposed to do all of this.

The trap most development teams fall into is simple, previously the IT Infrastructure team tended to be the location where resources like AD, SMTP, enablement tools, monitoring, backup resided.  The same group tended to also house the CMDB, the Change Advisory Board, the helpdesk, IT Accounting and other functions to approve expenditures.  Someone in this group tended to obtain approvals, thus slowing deployment but ultimately controlling cost and risks for the business.  The enablement tools and services also have to be sized for growth as the applications depend on them.  This is where ITIL, LEAN Six Sigma, and DevOps can walk merrily together into full business, IT and Application Automation.

One of the biggest reasons to move to the cloud and to use DevOps is for applications which have promotional or flash events/sales.  Two examples are eCommerce sites which have a large product launch, and sites which have large numbers of user hitting it at one time (think Fantasy Sports sites).  One of my previous customers on average has 130,000 unique visitors a day, when they launch the release of a very desirable product at midnight twice a year, they have over 3 Million unique visitors in the first 15 minutes of the promotion.  There is no reason for this customer to build all the capacity for a one day event and keep it running all year, so they use DevOps to expand the footprint for promotions, and DevOps to spin the footprint back down as the demand subsides.  This is a fairly predictable event, and they use ITIL to approve expenditure, rollout and build, and LEAN to measure the results of the promotion.  DevOps feeds the other processes.  Without the measurement, there is no way to determine SLA, and profitability.  DevOps is fed by the ITIL process.

Another customer is a large provider of Fantasy Sports.  This customer has 90% of its users sign in 2 hours before the start of the weekend games.  They use DevOps to automate building of the infrastructure as well.  The difference for them, if a particular high calibre player is injured during the week, their usage also swells unpredictably.  They use DevOps to scale when they see thresholds being met.  In both cases ITIL approvals are auto-set based upon CPU/Disk/Memory thresholds being monitoring by standard ITIL monitoring toolsets.  Lean was used to determine the fastest methods to spin up resources and fed the DevOps efforts.

DevOps can integrate into Business Approvals, and ITIL tools and Lean can be used to streamline and measure.  There is a reason ITIL is used in every large enterprise, SI and service provider it’s make sure everything is documented, profitable and efficient and that what is promised is delivered.

Guy Fawkes Mask

(Photo credit: Metal Chris)

Last night I celebrated bonfire night with friends.  Now for those of you unfamiliar with bonfire night in England it refers to Guy Fawkes‘s unsuccessful attempt to blow up Parliament in 1605.  See ( for more info.  This is a fairly diverse group of Englishmen and women, 2 Irish wives, 1 Scot, a woman of Indian descent among other nationalities and myself an American.  Everyone enjoyed the night, and the fireworks.

Flag of Scotland. Ratio 3:5. The blue used is ...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Throughout the evening, one jolly fellow who had a little more to drink than he probably should began to poke at the differences.  To be clear, he was being silly but was asking some good questions.  He first took aim at the Scot, who has lived in England for 32 years, and is married to an Irish woman as well.  He asked, “what do you think about Scotland voting for Independence  next year?”  To which my Scottish friend replied he had his own opinions, but he was grateful for the hospitality he has received for the last 32 years he has spent in this country.  He continued to note that England has been the most welcoming place he has ever lived (including the USA, Scotland and a few African countries).   He did point out a general pompousness, but then again many Scots are arseholes.  His response was graceful and designed to defuse the conversation.

Belfast peace wall graffiti

(Photo credit: photographphil)

When the music shifted to traditional Irish music so the girls could dance a bit, that is when this same jolly fellow, shifted to making fun of the Irish and more specifically the Catholics.  Now granted, this national holiday is to commemorate the failed attempt of a group of Catholics to blow up Parliament and King James I to restore England to a Catholic nation…but still…  The discussion turned to the walled neighborhoods of Belfast (which I have never visited) and the continued unease in Northern England.  Two of the other men joined to note that recently they were in Belfast on business and still saw English armoured vehicles and tanks in the Belfast streets.  While there is a cease fire, the resentment and will to fight is still there.  The men concluded its “just the Irish” or the fact they are “Catholic” for the violence.  Obviously the Irish women took offence but also gracefully shook off the conversation.  I simply sat there and took in the conversation.

The Gadsden flag

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The conversation then took aim at me.  They pointedly asked me my thoughts about England vs. America.  I noted besides the fact I can’t get a decent steak, its a pretty great place to live.  Of course, they wouldn’t let it stay there.  I articulated that there are many differences, mostly that people in England tend to defer more to the government and seem to not want to make a decision, but instead allow higher ups to decide or further defer…while people in the USA tend to try to make the decisions at a much lower level.  In particular the responses “Its not possible I’m afraid,” and “I can’t help you, I’m afraid,” are way too common of responses in any customer service or government situation.  It is a designed circular process so no one makes the decision to help or say no…  They asked where I would prefer to live as well  My response was equally PC, “America is my home, but I would love to have a UK citizenship so I could pay a lower tax rate and not be double taxed.”  They laughed and moved on, but noted the reluctance to do anything and to defer is b/c if someone did the wrong thing in the past they were severely punished…see Guy Fawkes…so they tend to have been bred to just give in to the government.


EU NO (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

It was my turn to ask a question.  Do you want to leave the EU?  Remember the conversation started with the Scot’s referendum to leave the UK, which they joined in 1707 basically to help stem impending bankruptcy (  Most thought Scotland leaving the United Kingdom was nuts b/c they couldn’t survive on their own.  When asked they all said the UK should cede from the EU, minimally  just from putting UK money into the EU coffers.  The vote is scheduled for 2017 (or possibly sooner).  They talked about not consenting to being ruled by Brussels, having to allow people in from the EU to take their jobs, and generally the fact they are a proud nation with the 6th largest economy.  Now, Scotland wants to leave b/c they are taking in so much money in fish, natural gas and oil and feel that they donate to the UK…the English tend to believe they send welfare money to Scotland…  Does anyone besides me, think Texas and North/South Carolina eerily similar here???

English: Flag of England and the Union Jack fl...

Flag of England and Union Jack(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

At some point, I was asked if we celebrate Guy Fawkes in America.  I answered no, and in fact I really didn’t know anything about Guy Fawkes until I moved here.  Cheekily, I was asked if there was anything we shoot fireworks off for.  I said, just the Fourth of July and New Years.  Also cheekily, “so what is the Fourth of July about,” was asked.  My response, “We celebrate the Fourth b/c we don’t have your tanks in our streets and that we aren’t sending our tax dollars back to a smaller economy.”    The Scot, the Indian and the Irish all smiled while the English booed and hissed through their laughter.  In reality, the only ones who do not have a history of fighting for their independence is England…so I’d like to say welcome to the club.

Mel Gibson as William Wallace wearing woad.

Freeeeedommmm(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

No one wants a remote government of people you didn’t elect ruling you.  Whether that be Scotland, Ireland, England, Texas, the Carolina’s or Afghanstan, Iraq, etc.  The closer the government is to the people, the easier you can sway and influence (maybe except here 🙂 ).  It is good to have a conversation where all can agree/disagree yet continue to enjoy each other’s company, and its good to see we are all the same.  The upside of democracy is you can elect who you want but majority rules, the downside is identical.  The upside of a republic you don’t have protection of majority rule, the downside is you have little control who represents the whole.  Voting to succeed is happening everywhere….even the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and a few counties in Colorado are talking state succession.  The group found this amazing!

One last thought, while there was fighting in India, they eventually won their independence through peaceful disobedience.  I do enjoy the fact both Scotland and England are looking to votes, considering their histories, its nice to see they are taking notes from one of their former colonies as opposed to their own histories for resolving their disputes.  And in doing so, we could continue to enjoy more fireworks, music and cheer.

photoMy father grew up dirt poor.  The room he shared with his brother was not insulated, was simply lifted off the ground by blocks and did not have any heat.  They grew up with a cow in the front yard and an outhouse in the back.  As one of the youngest of 7 kids, he was not afforded glasses for his eyes, nor did he receive hearing aids for his ears.  This was life in Appalachian Clermont County.  They made

His mother was a frail woman, and his father was abusive.  My dad told me of how his father regularly beat him and a select few of his siblings.  Once, he hit my father in the head with a cast iron skillet.  This was the moment where my father noted his eyesight was no longer right, and he could no longer hear properly.

Somehow my father managed to finish high school while never really being able to hear the teacher, or see the board.  The abuse and lack of being able to hear in loud settings made him socially awkward.  He managed to find a job at a Big Boy cooking, then he worked on the line at the Keebler plant, and finally for 33 years he worked as a Union machinist at Cincinnati Gear.  He even became the union representative for a few years within the local UAW chapter.   His proudest moment was when he became a Gear Master.  I can still remember him practicing his speech which he did humorously noting he didn’t have much to say, then unfurling a ream of old school computer

As a child I never fully understood how difficult it was for him to relate, or to comprehend what was going on.  He worked a lot of hours to get overtime (which I didn’t understand as a child) so I did resent the fact he didn’t toss ball with me.  He wasn’t athletic and by extension, neither was I.  I treated him poorly, mostly because I was ruthlessly bullied in school, and regret that to this day.  He was working his butt off for our family to provide, and I realize that now as a father myself.

The overtime is what allowed my parents to afford mine any my sister’s tuition at the local Catholic schools.  My father never made more than $12/hour and after the union went on strike, it dropped to $10/hour.  My mother had to babysit to help ends meet.  For the majority of my childhood, we only had one car.  They sacrificed for our education.  They always fought about money, and if they could continue to afford to send us to a private school.

One memory that stands out in my head is a bike ride my father took me on.  I probably wasn’t more than 8 or 9 years old.  We rode up to and around the local public high school.   It was summer break and the day before my mother had taken us to visit my dad at work and have lunch with him, we even got a tour of the factor.  As we rode our bikes I told my dad I wanted to work at Cincinnati Gear with him when I grew up.  He stopped the bike and told me, “I don’t ever want you to work in a factory!  My body aches when I get home, I have metal splinters in my hands and even in my eyes.  I want you to learn so you can work with your brain.  Give your children a better life than I could give you.  I want you to remember this.”  I promised I would remember, and we rode off.

He was once hospitalized for months.  I was too young to understand, and to this day I don’t remember what it was for.  We did have to take assistance for a time, but we were luckily didn’t have to go on welfare thanks to the kindness of relatives and our church.  Even if we needed welfare, we wouldn’t have been eligible at the time b/c we owned our home.  My father didn’t want a hand-out, and my mother increased the number of kids she watched to make ends meet.  When I was a freshman in high school we learned my father was going blind from glaucoma and he continued to work until the doctor no longer allowed him to drive.  This was devastating for him.  I still remember him waking in the middle of the night screaming for my mother to take the wheel, as the nightmares of what was to unfold came to him nightly.

While my friends parents bought them cars, paid for their insurance, bought them stereos and cool clothes; I worked.  I delivered papers, cut lawns and eventually worked cleaning dishes.  I bought my own TV, stereo, gaming system and my first car at 16.  When my friends were out partying on weekends, I was putting in double shifts at Kings Island amusement park.  I managed to hold down jobs while attending school, wrestling, and running track.  My mother was forced to shutter her babysitting business to take a low pay job at a grocery store running the register simply to have insurance.  I only was home to sleep and eat missing much of the agony my parents were going through.

My first year at the University of Cincinnati, I bussed tables at an Applebees, worked the register at a department store, worked at a telemarketing company and  managed a Little Caesers.  My good friend Dwayne told me he could recommend me at a Circuit City and I started there selling phones and computers.  That year, I made a little over $18k and my parents made $16k.  I somehow had become the breadwinner and I found out the University of Cincinnati and the tuition assistance program had no common sense.

When I applied for financial aid when still in high school, the University told me my parents made too much money.  The year before my dad was still working and my mother was babysitting, therefore I was ineligible for help.  That year I made more money than my parents, therefore I was ineligible for aid.  The hard work ethic I learned from my parents was actually hurting me.  Thanks!

While working the register my mother was appalled to see people perfectly capable of work coming in using their food stamps month after month.  They were buying leg of lamb and the expensive milk with those stamps, while we were eating store brand mac n’ cheese.  They came through with the expensive name brand prescriptions, while my dad had to wait for the generic drugs to become available before our insurance would pay.  These people didn’t pay for their homes, food, medical care, phones, anything.  Meanwhile, Social Security was not yet paying as they evaluated whether my father was disabled enough.  The social safety net we paid taxes into for years supposedly to help people like my family was ripped wide open to provide a hammock for others not willing to work.

I will never begrudge anyone who needs help.  People, who have worked their whole life and suddenly are laid off, downsized etc, need that social safety net.  People who are born with needs or become disabled need that net.  Why do we give a hammock to people who do not take advantage of the education we provide and try to work their way up?  Why do we subsidize the lazy to vote for the placating politician?

The union helped my family survive, and allowed my parents the ability to pay for our education.  Unions are needed for dangerous back breaking jobs, but not for while collar jobs where the threat of stubbing your finger on a keyboard is the only threat.  Government unions only feed the politicians and starve the funds for the safety net.

As we have seen from these two recent studies welfare pays more than work in many states, including 9 states which pay more than a teacher’s salary and 6 which pay more than a computer programmer:

We still say if my father didn’t have bad luck, he wouldn’t have any luck at all…yet his hard work is what kept us afloat without taking hand-outs longer than needed.  Blindness, hearing aids, diabetes and allergies to insulin, skin cancer, neuro issues, heart attack, hip replacement, getting run over by a car, all couldn’t stop him.  No excuses just do what you can and make due.

We need to acknowledge that people can, even with poor and abused backgrounds can make it in life if they put in the effort.  We also need to recognize that the untaxed nature of benefits and the taxation of work disincentives moving from the dole to work.  We should simply get rid of the income tax in favour of a FAIR TAX to help speed that process and continue to enforce work requirements as Clinton pursued.  Even through illness and adversity, people can succeed if they simply make due and try.

While the 2 party system and the media try to pit “the working class” against the “rich and business” Americans who work should be focused on those who choose not to work.  Again, the social safety net is needed, for those who ACTUALLY NEED IT and we should help them FIRST.

45455_426911218350_6662844_nAt this phase in life my parents are both retired, they have long ago paid off their house and while still in poor health are managing to enjoy life.  They are strivers and survivors!  They are people you should admire, look up to, and teach your children to be like.  I have parlayed my interest in computers into a great career; I am the beneficiary of my parents’ life lessons and work ethic.  From poor, abused Appalachian child to wonderful provider and father is an accomplishment.  All the while, with all the hardships and a few weeks of assistance, he accomplished what he wanted and I have accomplished what he asked.

Great Article by John Biggs

Aqueduct of Segovia

When I was young I enjoyed reading about the Ancient Greeks and Romans.  I found the early democracies and republic fascinating.  The Greeks were great inventors of the Olympics, theatre, nautical and land warfare, mythology, etc.  The Romans were great engineers, nation builders, diplomats, etc.

One persistent notion always pervaded my thinking which I am revisiting as an adult.  The Romans didn’t necessarily invent much, but they did take what they discovered from conquered lands and they used it as their own.  They didn’t invent arches, the Etruscans did.  They took much of the mythology and stories of the Greeks and simply changed the names.  They didn’t discard what they found in their conquests; they embraced those discoveries and in many instances improved them.  Romans took roads, wine, concrete, aqueducts, theatre, gods, republic, Romans citizen legal rights, and distributed them throughout the known world by institutionalizing them and making them part of the process.  As their legions moved across the map, they built these modernizing concepts making the local people almost happy to become Roman.

When I was young it bothered me that the Romans didn’t invent most of these ideas.  Now, I understand you don’t need to invent to be disruptive.  You simply need to take good ideas, never be dismissive of them, incorporate them into your process, and when you can improve them as you expand.  This is a lesson we can all learn from in business and IT.